Here's a classic Bil-LIE post:

The Federal Courts have ruled that attorneys may not demand any fees whatever from a defendant in a judgment since the attorney has no contract with a debtor nor has he performed any service for the debtor.

An attorney only has a client relationship with the creditor and it is to the creditor to whom he must look for his fees, not the debtor. Therefore an attorney who demands and gets attorney fees from a debtor through judgment has committed a fraud upon the court, he has committed a fraud upon the debtor and he is liable for unlimited damages and loss of his authority to practice law upon conviction of a felony against the defendant. It's not easy to get the job done, but it can be done and it has been done and it has been done by pro se litigants. Pretty hard to get one thief to go after another in a court of law.

The judgment will always be overturned for fraud on those grounds alone although it may have to be taken to higher courts to get justice. You want to keep on telling me what the courts have ruled and I'll pop the cases up here so fast it'll make your fool head swim.

Ok Bil-LIE, how about just one case?

Normie the stupid thinks he has found a hot one to make a new Bil-LIE out of but if he actually knew anything about how contract law works then he would know that the attorney never brings suit for his own fees. He would know and understand that "reasonable" attorney fees are always provided for in the original contract in case of default by the debtor. So, ostensibly at least, the attorney is paid by the creditor who has included the attorney fees whatever they may be in the demand for judgment. He never has to file a separate suit for his fees as they are already provided for in the contract. If Normie were an attorney and waited on the debtors he sued to pay him he would starve to death before he ever got a dime and that is exactly the reason attorneys get paid by their clients and not the party they are filing lawsuits against.

If a judgment is obtained and the debtor does pay off he has to pay the attorney and the attorney remits any leftover money collected to his client.

Poor old fogheaded Normie is far too stupid to understand that and in the process provides proof positive that his only purpose in life is to invent more Bil-LIES. Too bad he can't rest in peace. Wait for his next exciting to appear on his stolen name blog which he calls "creditwrench-thetruth" but which only contains more contrived Bil-LIES.

The man is a liar, a thief, an ignormus and a con artist who thinks he knows it all. If he could be bought for what he is worth and sold for what he thinks he is worth we could pay off the national debt and have money left over to get Social Security out of the sea of red ink too.